Alternaria alternata Pathogen from Cuscuta japonica Could Serve as a Potential Bioherbicide

Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) is a dangerous parasitic plant that causes serious damage to crop production and is challenging to eliminate. Herbicide application is a common strategy to control dodder in the field, but it is costly, ineffective, and further results in hazardous outcomes. Therefore, our study aims to identify the potential pathogens in naturally occurring dodder infections which may provide efficient biocontrol options. In this regard, the pathogens were isolated from the infected plants, their pathogenicity was validated through inoculation, and the optimal culture conditions for their growth were identified by determining the pathogenicity difference. The pathogenicity range was determined in vitro using the leaves of common horticultural plants and crops. Furthermore, a small range of horticultural plants parasitized by Cuscuta reflexa in the field were inoculated with the pathogen to determine their biosafety and biocontrol potential, and the pathogens were identified by morphological and molecular characterization. We found 7 strains that were isolated after pathogen enrichment culture. Among them, Cbp6 and Cbp7 showed the highest pathogenicity against C. reflexa. After testing the inoculation of more than 50 species of plants, only 9 species showed varying degrees of lesions on leaves, which proved the high biosafety for common plants. Field spraying of these pathogens showed a good control effect on C. reflexa after 21 days; the disease severityreached 66.0%, while its host plant did not display obvious symptoms. In conclusion, the pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were identified as Alternaria alternata, and the results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the biological control of dodder.


Introduction
Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) is a typical holoparasitic plant belonging to the family Convolvulaceae, order Solanales [1,2].Due to evolution, it is leafless and rootless, and although it contains trace amounts of chlorophyll, it no longer possesses photosynthetic abilities.Instead, it penetrates the host stem with a large number of haustoria, forming vascular connections to feed on the host's nutrients and water.It establishes a bidirectional link to transport signaling substances, viruses, secondary metabolites, proteins, mRNAs, small RNAs, and lncRNAs in the host plant which severely limits its growth and development [3][4][5][6][7].With a wide host range, they can parasitize a variety of herbaceous and woody plants, including common horticultural plants and important crops [8].Dodder not only restricts plant growth but also acts as a source of various pathogens which is concern for global agriculture.Cuscuta spp.are reported to be infectious and can transmit over 50 types of viruses.On the other hand, it is also reported that species such as C. campestris, C. australis, and C. japonica can limit the growth of Mikania micrantha, Humulus scandens, and Ambrosia trifida within their native ranges.Thus, some of the dodder species exhibit a degree of biological control potential against other invasive weeds [7,9,10].Furthermore, they are rich in flavonoids and other plant molecules which promote antiviral, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory activities [11,12].Nonetheless, they causes huge losses in agricultural production and has a negative effect on biodiversity that far outweighs its applied value.
Dodder uses invasive structural haustoria to connect with the host vascular tissue, thus forming a stable parasitic state; therefore, the damage is persistent, widespread, serious, and difficult to eradicate [13].Currently, few host plants are completely resistant to dodder [14,15].Herbicides and other chemical pesticides have shown good control effects against dodder but have an adverse effect on the growth and development of host plants and the ecological environment, and also lead to development of resistance [16,17].In addition, although the manual removal is beneficial, it is time-consuming, laborious, and expensive, so there is currently no efficient control method.
Biological control methods utilizing microbes that are naturally pathogenic to weeds is a safe, economical, and environmentally sustainable option [18].For instance, Alternaria destruens L. Simmons strain 059 registered as Smoulder ® , is a fungus that is pathogenic towards dodder species.It was isolated as an indigenous pathogen from swamp dodder and has been used to control several species in crops such as alfalfa, dry bog cranberry, carrot, pepper, tomato, eggplant, blueberry, and woody ornamentals [19].However, such microbial resources against weeds, especially dodder, are scarce.Therefore, our study aimed to identify microbes that are pathogenic to dodder species to devise an environmentally friendly and cost-effective control strategy.
To find natural infection, a field visit to Huili County ( 27• 84 ′ 38.57′′ N, 102 • 33 ′ 94.57′′ E), Sichuan Province, China, was conducted in March 2023, where C. japonica parasitizing Ligustrum quihoui was found to be dying of the disease.The symptoms, such as large areas of black spots on the stalks, and browning, dehydration, and atrophy on the upper end of the stem, were recorded.It was hypothesized that these symptoms might be caused by the plant pathogens.To isolate and explore the pathogens, samples were collected from the field and healthy plants were inoculated with the possible pathogens to confirm their pathogenicity.Diseased tissues were isolated, and pathogens were identified by Koch's postulates.The pathogenic strains identified may provide effective means to develop bioherbicides against dodder species.

Diseased Sample Collection and Pathogen Enrichment Culture
Naturally infected C. japonica was collected from Huili County (27  74 ′ 89.22 ′′ E).In order to verify the pathogenicity and to enrich pathogens, infected C. japonica and healthy C. reflexa were mixed and placed in a plastic bag to maintain moisture.Healthy dodder was used as a control and kept in a 25 • C incubator for 7 days.During this period, the degree of disease incidence was observed.Afterward, the length of the black-brown wilt spot and the total length were measured, and the length of the lesions and the disease severity were calculated according to the following formula [20]: Disease severity (%) = (total length of lesions/total length of investigated dodder stem) × 100

Pathogen Isolation and Pathogenicity Determination
Pathogens were isolated from naturally infected C. japonica collected from the field and diseased C. reflexa after enrichment culture.The infected tissues were rinsed under running water, soaked in 75% alcohol for 30 s for surface disinfection, and rinsed three times with sterile water to remove the alcohol.The infected stems were cut into small squares of 1-3 mm length and then transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA: 200 g/L potato, 20 g/L glucose, 15 g/L agar) medium plates containing rifampicin (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and ampicillin (Solarbio, Beijing, China) at a concentration of 10 mg/L each, and then incubated at 28 • C for 1-3 days.The pure isolates were obtained according to the colony morphology.
To determine the pathogenicity of the isolates (recovered from naturally infected C. japonica and inoculated C. reflexa), the stems of the healthy dodder (C.reflexa) were cut into 5 cm segments, and the surfaces were disinfected with 75% alcohol.Then, they were placed on the PDA plates containing the isolates with colony diameters of up to 2 cm, and incubated at 28 • C for 3 days.The appearance of black-brown lesions on the dodder stems and/or the growth of mycelium on the surface of the stems were used as the basis of pathogenicity, and the pathogenic isolates were screened out according to morbidity status.After the preliminary screening, the candidate strains were cultured on PDA plates for 7 days, and then the mycelium was gently scraped down and cultured for another 3-5 days to induce the production of a large number of conidia.The conidia were eluted with sterile water containing 0.2% (v/v) Tween-20, and the concentration was adjusted to 1 × 10 6 spores/mL.Healthy C. reflexa with a total length of 5 m was placed in a plastic bag and uniformly sprayed with 10 mL of conidial suspension, while water was used as negative control; each treatment had 3 replicates.Afterwards, the plants were placed in a constant temperature incubator at 25 • C for 7-14 days.The lesions on the dodder stems were continually observed and photographed during this period to calculate disease severity.Following Koch's postulates, the pathogen was re-isolated, and the pathogenicity was determined.

Determination of Differences in the Pathogenicity of Dodder Pathogens
Spore suspensions of highly pathogenic strains were prepared as described previously, and the spore concentrations were adjusted to 1 × 10 6 , 1 × 10 7 , and 1 × 10 8 spores/mL.Healthy C. reflexa of 5 m in length was sprayed with 10 mL of spore suspension, or sterile water as a control; each treatment had 3 replicates.After 7 days of incubation, as described above, the length of the lesions was measured, the disease severity was calculated, and the pathogenicity of the different concentrations of spore suspensions was compared.

Physiological Characterization of Dodder Pathogens
To determine the optimal growth conditions and nutritional requirements of dodder pathogens, colony growth, and conidia production ability were examined using different media, pH values, and temperatures.Firstly, the pathogens were inoculated onto the center of PDA medium plates and incubated at 28 • C for 7 days.A 7 mm sterile perforator was used to perforate along the same circumference, and the mycelial blocks were inoculated onto the center of PDA, corn meal agar (CMA; Hopebiol, Qingdao, China), and malt extract agar (MEA; Solarbio, Beijing, China) medium plates (the diameter of the plate was 6.0 cm, and each plate contained 15 mL of medium).Each treatment had 3 replicates and each replicate consisted of 4 plates which were incubated at 28 • C for 3-5 days, after which the colony diameters were measured to compare the growth status of the pathogens.At the same time, the surface of the colonies on the plates cultured for 7 days were gently scraped and then cultured for another 3-5 days under dark conditions to stimulate the production of conidia.Each plate was washed with 15 mL of sterile water containing 0.2% (v/v) Tween-20 to wash off the conidia, and the number of conidia was then counted to determine the optimum medium for conidia production.To determine the optimum pH value for dodder pathogens, the pathogens were inoculated onto PDA medium with varying pH values of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.Colony diameters and conidia production were measured after incubation under the same conditions as before.Additionally, the pathogens were inoculated onto PDA medium and incubated at different temperatures of 4, 16, 22, 28, 32, and 38 • C. Afterward, the colony diameters and conidia production were measured to determine the optimum growth temperature for dodder pathogens.

Determination of the Pathogenic Range of Dodder Pathogens
To evaluate the safety of dodder pathogens in common plants, the pathogenicity of the candidate pathogens on the leaves of common plants was determined by in vitro leaf inoculation.Host plant leaves of Cuscuta spp.were collected from Kunming city (25 • 12 ′ 82.65 ′′ N,

Determination of the Efficacy of the Pathogen against Dodder in the Field
After investigation, naturally infected H. nepalensis var.sinensis and V. major (6 plants each) parasitized by C. reflexa were located on the farm of Yunnan Agricultural University, Panlong District, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.To verify the control effect of the candidate pathogens on C. reflexa in the field environment and to determine biosafety in the host plants, a spore suspension of the pathogen at a concentration of 1 × 10 8 spores/mL was uniformly sprayed onto the C. reflexa plants and the host plants in the field.Symptoms were observed at 7, 14, and 21 days after treatment; lesion length was measured and disease severity was calculated, while relative control effect was calculated according to the following formula [20]: Relative control effect (%) = (disease severity in treatment group − disease severity in control group) × 100/(100 − disease severity in control group) (1)

Identification of Dodder Pathogens
Dodder pathogens were cultured on PDA plates, and characteristics such as appearance, morphology, and colony color were observed.Furthermore, structures such as mycelium, conidiophore, conidia, and chlamydospore were observed under the microscope.Meanwhile, the genomic DNA of the pathogen was extracted by the CTAB method and primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 [21], LR0F/LR5R [22], bRPB2-6F/bRPB2-7R [23], and EF1-1018F/EF1-1620R [22] were used to amplify the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA, large subunit ribosomal rRNA (LSU), RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2), and translation elongation factor 1α (TEF-1α) gene, respectively.The PCR reaction mixture contained 6.0 µL of buffer (2× Taq master mix, Novoprotein, Suzhou, China), 1 µL of forward and reverse primers, 11 µL ddH 2 O, and 1 µL genomic DNA.The amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 • C for 4.5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 • C for 45 s, annealing at 52 • C for 45 s, and extension at 72 • C for 1.5 min, followed by a final extension at 72 • C for 10 min [24].The amplified products were sent to Shanghai Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China for sequencing, and the sequences were obtained and compared with the homologous sequence information in GenBank (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi,accessed on 1 December 2023).The homology of the sequences was analyzed by MEGA 11 and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [25].

Data Statistics
The mean, variance, and standard deviation of the experimental data were calculated using the software SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and multiple comparisons were performed using Duncan's new multiple range test (p < 0.05); the data results were expressed as "mean ± standard deviation".All images were processed using Adobe Illustrator 2022 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Dodder Pathogen Enrichment Culture
After 7 days of inoculation with diseased tissues, the healthy dodder showed symptoms including large areas of black spots, browning, dehydration, atrophy, and a small amount of mold on the stem.With an extension in the incubation time, a large number of stems with black spots were rotted.On the other hand, the dodder sprayed with sterile water grow normally without obvious symptoms, and its stem showed a yellowish-green color with sufficient moisture content (Figure 1A,B).Meanwhile, the disease severity of the stem was 64.93% after 7 days of inoculation, suggesting that a large number of pathogens existed in the infected dodder, which could quickly infect the healthy dodder (Figure 1C).
Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China for sequencing, and the sequences were obtained and compared with the homologous sequence information in GenBank (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi,accessed on 1 December 2023).The homology of the sequences was analyzed by MEGA 11 and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [25].

Data Statistics
The mean, variance, and standard deviation of the experimental data were calculated using the software SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and multiple comparisons were performed using Duncan's new multiple range test (p < 0.05); the data results were expressed as "mean ± standard deviation".All images were processed using Adobe Illustrator 2022 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Dodder Pathogen Enrichment Culture
After 7 days of inoculation with diseased tissues, the healthy dodder showed symptoms including large areas of black spots, browning, dehydration, atrophy, and a small amount of mold on the stem.With an extension in the incubation time, a large number of stems with black spots were rotted.On the other hand, the dodder sprayed with sterile water grow normally without obvious symptoms, and its stem showed a yellowish-green color with sufficient moisture content (Figure 1A,B).Meanwhile, the disease severity of the stem was 64.93% after 7 days of inoculation, suggesting that a large number of pathogens existed in the infected dodder, which could quickly infect the healthy dodder (Figure 1C).

Pathogens of Dodder and Their Pathogenicity
By comparing the colony morphology, a total of 17 pure cultures were isolated from the infected samples, with 11 isolates from the naturally infected samples from the field and 6 isolates from the samples infected by enrichment inoculation.After preliminary inoculation, 7 isolates were significantly pathogenic to C. reflexa and numbered as Cbp1-Cbp7.Based on their morphological characteristics, it was initially determined that most of the isolated strains were Alternaria spp.and Fusarium spp.(Figure 2A).After inoculation

Pathogens of Dodder and Their Pathogenicity
By comparing the colony morphology, a total of 17 pure cultures were isolated from the infected samples, with 11 isolates from the naturally infected samples from the field and 6 isolates from the samples infected by enrichment inoculation.After preliminary inoculation, 7 isolates were significantly pathogenic to C. reflexa and numbered as Cbp1-Cbp7.Based on their morphological characteristics, it was initially determined that most of the isolated strains were Alternaria spp.and Fusarium spp.(Figure 2A).After inoculation with spore liquid spray, all 7 isolates were able to cause disease in C. reflexa, with dark brown lesions of varying lengths appearing on the stem, and the whole section of the stem becoming wilted and dehydrated.Colonies treated with isolates displayed the same characteristics as those obtained after re-isolation.Among them, the symptoms were more obvious after inoculation with Cbp6 and Cbp7, showing a large number of lesions appearing on the middle of the stems in addition to the black-brown lesions on the ends.In contrast, the dodder sprayed with the water control grow well and did not show obvious symptoms in the stem except for the blackening and constriction at both ends (Figure 2B).Comparison of the disease severity showed that Cbp6 and Cbp7 were the most pathogenic to C. reflexa with disease severity of 63.33% and 59.67% obtained based on re-isolation, respectively, which were significantly higher than the other isolates (Figure 2C).
becoming wilted and dehydrated.Colonies treated with isolates displayed the same characteristics as those obtained after re-isolation.Among them, the symptoms were more obvious after inoculation with Cbp6 and Cbp7, showing a large number of lesions appearing on the middle of the stems in addition to the black-brown lesions on the ends.In contrast, the dodder sprayed with the water control grow well and did not show obvious symptoms in the stem except for the blackening and constriction at both ends (Figure 2B).Comparison of the disease severity showed that Cbp6 and Cbp7 were the most pathogenic to C. reflexa with disease severity of 63.33% and 59.67% obtained based on re-isolation, respectively, which were significantly higher than the other isolates (Figure 2C).

Differences in the Pathogenicity of Dodder Pathogens
Higher concentrations of spore suspensions of the pathogen were found to be more pathogenic to C. reflexa.After 7 days of inoculation, C. reflexa cultured with water was healthy and strong, with yellowish-green stems and no obvious lesions.While C. reflexa stems sprayed with different concentrations of spore suspensions of Cbp6 and Cbp7 showed large black-brown lesions, wilting, and dehydration.Further, these symptoms were more obvious with an increase in inoculation concentration; at higher concentrations, stem segments started rotting (Figure 3A).After inoculation with a concentration of 1 × 10 8 spores/mL of Cbp7, the disease severity was 46.30% which was slightly higher than that of Cbp6 (37.46%) (Figure 3B).

Differences in the Pathogenicity of Dodder Pathogens
Higher concentrations of spore suspensions of the pathogen were found to be more pathogenic to C. reflexa.After 7 days of inoculation, C. reflexa cultured with water was healthy and strong, with yellowish-green stems and no obvious lesions.While C. reflexa stems sprayed with different concentrations of spore suspensions of Cbp6 and Cbp7 showed large black-brown lesions, wilting, and dehydration.Further, these symptoms were more obvious with an increase in inoculation concentration; at higher concentrations, stem segments started rotting (Figure 3A).After inoculation with a concentration of 1 × 10 8 spores/mL of Cbp7, the disease severity was 46.30% which was slightly higher than that of Cbp6 (37.46%) (Figure 3B).

Physiological Characterization of Dodder Pathogens
Dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were able to grow on the test media, and the colony diameter was the largest on the PDA medium.The quantities of conidia from both pathogens were significantly higher on the PDA medium than on the other media.There-

Physiological Characterization of Dodder Pathogens
Dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were able to grow on the test media, and the colony diameter was the largest on the PDA medium.The quantities of conidia from both pathogens were significantly higher on the PDA medium than on the other media.Therefore, PDA medium is optimal for the mycelium growth and the production of conidia by pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 (Figure 4A,B).In the pH value range of 4-11, the colonies of both pathogens grow rapidly and produced the most conidia at pH 7, while they grow slower and produced fewer conidia under acidic and alkaline conditions (Figure 4C,D).The colonies of Cbp6 and Cbp7 grow best at 22-28 • C, but most conidia were produced at 28 • C, while low or high temperatures were unfavorable for their growth and conidia production (Figure 4E,F).

Physiological Characterization of Dodder Pathogens
Dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were able to grow on the test media, and the colony diameter was the largest on the PDA medium.The quantities of conidia from both pathogens were significantly higher on PDA medium than on the other media.Therefore, PDA medium is optimal for the mycelium growth and the production of conidia by pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 (Figure 4A,B).In the pH value range of 4-11, the colonies of both pathogens grow rapidly and produced the most conidia at pH 7, while they grow slower and produced fewer conidia under acidic and alkaline conditions (Figure 4C,D).The colonies of Cbp6 and Cbp7 grow best at 22-28 °C, but most conidia were produced at 28 °C, while low or high temperatures were unfavorable for their growth and conidia production (Figure 4E,F).

Pathogenic Range of Dodder Pathogens
After the inoculation of leaves from 50 plant species, the pathogens from leaves showing symptoms were re-isolated, and the isolates were morphologically consistent with the inoculated pathogen colonies.It was verified that the pathogenicity spectrum of pathogen Cbp7 was wider, and it was pathogenic towards 9 plant species, namely: I. ensata, J. nudiflorum, G. max, O. fragrans, D. lotus, R. pulchrum, C. camphora, C. Sinensis, and H. henryi, but not C. reflexa.However, Cbp6 was not pathogenic to H. henryi, and was less pathogenic than Cbp7 to the other plant leaves.In addition to this, C. moschata and N. tabacum leaves showed slight yellowing after inoculation, whereas the other uninfected leaves were healthier and had no lesions (Figure 5).
pathogen Cbp7 was wider, and it was pathogenic towards 9 plant species, namely: I. ensata, J. nudiflorum, G. max, O. fragrans, D. lotus, R. pulchrum, C. camphora, C. Sinensis, and H. henryi, but not C. reflexa.However, Cbp6 was not pathogenic to H. henryi, and was less pathogenic than Cbp7 to the other plant leaves.In addition to this, C. moschata and N. tabacum leaves showed slight yellowing after inoculation, whereas the other uninfected leaves were healthier and had no lesions (Figure 5).

Efficacy of Pathogens against Dodder in the Field
After spray inoculation, dodder in the field also showed the symptoms described before; most of the stems had a dark brown color, dried, and died after shriveling due to dehydration.Especially in the shaded and moist places of the inoculation site, the symptoms of mildew appeared (Figure 6A).After inoculation with Cbp7, the disease severity of C. reflexa reached 44.5% and 66.0% at 14 and 21 days, respectively.Compared with indoor inoculation, the outdoor environmental conditions were relatively complex, and the disease severity of outdoor inoculation was slightly lower than that of indoor, and delayed mortality in dodder was also noted (Figure 6B).The pathogen Cbp7 provided better control of C. reflexa, with a 61.3% relative control effect at 21 days, and the lesions still spread (Figure 6C).

Efficacy of Pathogens against Dodder in the Field
After spray inoculation, dodder in the field also showed the symptoms described before; most of the stems had a dark brown color, dried, and died after shriveling due to dehydration.Especially in the shaded and moist places of the inoculation site, the symptoms of mildew appeared (Figure 6A).After inoculation with Cbp7, the disease severity of C. reflexa reached 44.5% and 66.0% at 14 and 21 days, respectively.Compared with indoor inoculation, the outdoor environmental conditions were relatively complex, and the disease severity of outdoor inoculation was slightly lower than that of indoor, and delayed mortality in dodder was also noted (Figure 6B).The pathogen Cbp7 provided better control of C. reflexa, with a 61.3% relative control effect at 21 days, and the lesions still spread (Figure 6C).sata, J. nudiflorum, G. max, O. fragrans, D. lotus, R. pulchrum, C. camphora, C. Sinensis, and H. henryi, but not C. reflexa.However, Cbp6 was not pathogenic to H. henryi, and was less pathogenic than Cbp7 to the other plant leaves.In addition to this, C. moschata and N. tabacum leaves showed slight yellowing after inoculation, whereas the other uninfected leaves were healthier and had no lesions (Figure 5).

Efficacy of Pathogens against Dodder in the Field
After spray inoculation, dodder in the field also showed the symptoms described before; most of the stems had a dark brown color, dried, and died after shriveling due to dehydration.Especially in the shaded and moist places of the inoculation site, the symptoms of mildew appeared (Figure 6A).After inoculation with Cbp7, the disease severity of C. reflexa reached 44.5% and 66.0% at 14 and 21 days, respectively.Compared with indoor inoculation, the outdoor environmental conditions were relatively complex, and the disease severity of outdoor inoculation was slightly lower than that of indoor, and delayed mortality in dodder was also noted (Figure 6B).The pathogen Cbp7 provided better control of C. reflexa, with a 61.3% relative control effect at 21 days, and the lesions still spread (Figure 6C).

Identification of Dodder Pathogens
Pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 grow rapidly on PDA plates, with fluffy colonies and welldeveloped aerial mycelia.The colony colors of Cbp6 and Cbp7 were tan and gray-brown, respectively.The conidia were dark, with longitudinal and transversal septa, inverted clavate, ellipsoid, or ovate shaped, and with sizes ranging from 5-18 × 8-35 µm (average of 11.5 × 21.5 µm) (Figure 7A-F).The results of sequencing and BLAST homology comparison showed that the ITS, LSU, RPB2, and TEF-1α sequences of the pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were most closely related to Alternaria alternata or A. tenuissima, respectively, in the GenBank database.Since there were few strains containing TEF-1α sequences, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by joining the ITS, LSU, and RPB2 sequences, and the results of the phylogenetic tree also confirmed that Cbp6 and Cbp7 were most closely related to A. alternata (Figure 7G).A phylogenetic tree based on the TEF-1α gene is shown in the Supplementary Figure S1.After combining the molecular and morphological characteristics, Cbp6 and Cbp7 were identified as A. alternata.All of the above sequencing results have been submitted to the NCBI GenBank database, and the sequence accession numbers are listed in Figure 7G.
developed aerial mycelia.The colony colors of Cbp6 and Cbp7 were tan and gray-brown, respectively.The conidia were dark, with longitudinal and transversal septa, inverted clavate, ellipsoid, or ovate shaped, and with sizes ranging from 5-18 × 8-35 μm (average of 11.5 × 21.5 μm) (Figure 7A-F).The results of sequencing and BLAST homology comparison showed that the ITS, LSU, RPB2, and TEF-1α sequences of the pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 were most closely related to Alternaria alternata or A. tenuissima, respectively, in the GenBank database.Since there were few strains containing TEF-1α sequences, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by joining the ITS, LSU, and RPB2 sequences, and the results of the phylogenetic tree also confirmed that Cbp6 and Cbp7 were most closely related to A. alternata (Figure 7G).A phylogenetic tree based on the TEF-1α gene is shown in the Supplementary Figure S1.After combining the molecular and morphological characteristics, Cbp6 and Cbp7 were identified as A. alternata.All of the above sequencing results have been submitted to the NCBI GenBank database, and the sequence accession numbers are listed in Figure 7G.

Discussion
Dodder has intense growth competition with crops and horticultural plants and limits agricultural production resulting in serious economic losses [8].Chemical herbicides such as glyphosate, dicamba, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) cannot be used to control parasitic plants.This is because dodder forms a symbiotic relationship with the host plant and can readily transfer herbicide resistance or acquire systemic signaling substances from the host plant in response to insect feeding, pathogenic fungal infestation, and other various kinds of stress [16,[26][27][28].Biological herbicides can efficiently control herbicideresistant weeds while protecting ecosystem functioning and biodiversity in line with the concept of sustainable agriculture; therefore, they are ideal for the long-term control of dodder and other agricultural weeds [29].
Common plant pathogenic fungi such as Colletotrichum spp., Phoma spp., Alternaria spp., Fusarium spp., Curvularia spp., Cercospora spp., Trichoderma spp., and Puccinia spp.have been used as bioherbicides to control parasitic plants and weeds with good control effect [30][31][32][33][34]. In this study, a total of 7 dodder strains related to diseases were isolated based on colony morphology and microstructure.Alternaria spp. was most frequently isolated followed by Fusarium spp., known as the most common and destructive plant pathogens [35,36].When comparing pathogenicity, Cbp6 and Cbp7 were the most pathogenic, demonstrating good control of dodder in both in vitro and in vivo inoculations.It has been shown that pathogenic fungi such as F. semitectum, F. solani, A. tenuissima, and Pseudopestalotiopsis theae are pathogenic to C. reflexa [37].The above results demonstrate that Alternaria spp. is a dominant pathogenic fungus of dodder and has the potential to be used as a bioherbicide.
Additionally, plant pathogens may adversely affect crop production and forest health; therefore, before plant pathogens are used as bioherbicides they should be subjected to comprehensive host-specific testing to assess the effects they produce in target weeds and any risks they pose to non-target plants [18].Alternaria spp.are common plant pathogens that cause leaf spot or wilt in a large number of horticultural plants and crops, endangering agricultural production [38,39].However, it was confirmed that Cbp6 and Cbp7 were not significantly pathogenic to most of the plants, except for I. ensata, J. nudiflorum, and G. max.Meanwhile, C. reflexa parasitizing on H. nepalensis var.sinensis and V. major was controlled with highly pathogenic isolates.The pathogens showed efficient control of C. reflexa with wilting and death, while no disease was seen in the host plants, confirming that Cbp6 and Cbp7 are highly specific for C. reflexa, and have a high level of biosafety for horticultural plants and a low impact on the ecosystem.
According to statistics, there are more than 200 species of dodder in the world, and 14 species are growing in China.Among them, the most serious and common ones are C. reflexa, C. chinensis, C. australis, and C. japonica [1,40].The favorable climatic conditions and rich vegetation in Yunnan Province, China provide ideal conditions for dodder to parasitize other plants.C. reflexa infects 181 plants of 66 families and 161 genera in this area, and therefore it is one of the most abundant species [40].Dodder grows vigorously under suitable environmental conditions in the field and generally dies slowly after the host plant has completely withered and died because its weak photosynthesis is insufficient to sustain the physiological needs [3].

Conclusions
In conclusion, the pathogens isolated from the dead dodder species, C. reflexa and C. japonica effectively, while they were not pathogenic to the weeds' host plants, and can be regarded as biologically safe.Therefore, they have great potential for the biocontrol of dodders.Finally, our results provide a theoretical and experimental foundation for the prevention and control of dodders through the application of naturally occurring native pathogens.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Field symptoms of diseased C. japonica and pathogen enrichment culture.(A) field symptoms of diseased C. japonica (white dotted circle) and pathogenicity of inoculation on C. reflexa.(B) symptoms after 7 days of pathogen enrichment culture.(C) differences in disease severity in the field and after inoculation.Note: letters a and b indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Field symptoms of diseased C. japonica and pathogen enrichment culture.(A) field symptoms of diseased C. japonica (white dotted circle) and pathogenicity of inoculation on C. reflexa.(B) symptoms after 7 days of pathogen enrichment culture.(C) differences in disease severity in the field and after inoculation.Note: letters a and b indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Isolation and pathogenicity determination of dodder pathogens.(A) morphological characteristics of pathogens (white scale bar is 1 cm, black scale bar is 20 μm).(B) differences in the pathogenicity of pathogens.(C) differences in disease severity after inoculation with pathogens.Note: letters a-g indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Isolation and pathogenicity determination of dodder pathogens.(A) morphological characteristics of pathogens (white scale bar is 1 cm, black scale bar is 20 µm).(B) differences in the pathogenicity of pathogens.(C) differences in disease severity after inoculation with pathogens.Note: letters a-g indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Differences in the pathogenicity of the dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7.(A) pathogenicity of different concentrations of spore suspensions of pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(B) differences in disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.Note: letters a-c indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Differences in the pathogenicity of the dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7.(A) pathogenicity of different concentrations of spore suspensions of pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(B) differences in disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.Note: letters a-c indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Differences in the pathogenicity of the dodder pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7.(A) pathogenicity of different concentrations of spore suspensions of pathogens Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(B) differences in disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.Note: letters a-c indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Physiological characterization of dodder pathogens.Colony diameter (A) and conidia production (B) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on different media.Colony diameter (C) and conidia production (D) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 under different pH values.Colony diameter (E) and conidia production (F) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 under different temperature conditions.Note: letters a-e indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Physiological characterization of dodder pathogens.Colony diameter (A) and conidia production (B) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on different media.Colony diameter (C) and conidia production (D) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 under different pH values.Colony diameter (E) and conidia production (F) of Cbp6 and Cbp7 under different temperature conditions.Note: letters a-e indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Efficacy of pathogens against dodder in the field.(A) pathogenicity of pathogen Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa in the field.(B) disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(C) relative control

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Efficacy of pathogens against dodder in the field.(A) pathogenicity of pathogen Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa in the field.(B) disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(C) relative control Figure 6.Efficacy of pathogens against dodder in the field.(A) pathogenicity of pathogen Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa in the field.(B) disease severity of Cbp6 and Cbp7 on C. reflexa.(C) relative control effect of Cbp6 and Cbp7 against C. reflexa.Note: letters a-g indicate significant differences between the disease indices of the tested samples.